I bet all the slaves were into. I bet thats why they applied to be slaves. So: she fights back, and shes a good fighter, shes a strong woman dammit, and hes a lion of a man, so theres nothing problematic here, hbo, with the dreaming up, scripting, casting, shooting and disseminating of high-end historical softcore that shows, for a titillating. And thats the problem of the fight-fuck: it blurs the lines, and not in a helpful way. Its Robin Thicke as wannabe-tarantino. It plays at the edges of rapey fantasy.
Summary, game of, thrones, season 6, episode 2 Episode guide
Ditto, presumably, the roadside rapes, and the middle-of-the-tavern breast-washing-from-a-bowl that happens in at least one scene in Rome, incidental to the action, but somehow finding itself in the foreground of the shot. Im sure archaeologists have uncovered many touching tableaux, etched lovingly into the dusty vellum, of ancient women washing their breasts with sudden urgency in the middle of taverns. Them streets were dusty. But, back to honourable Chicken beating and fucking his slave. Or, to use the touching description from the videos uploader: Titus Polo and his slave girl get hot. The latent justification for the fight-fuck in this scene, the things that makes it all ok, is presumably that a) its the (oblivious) wife whos ordered the slave to be beaten in the first place, silly girl cuckold! So personal its not really male sexual violence, its just a totally hot Punch-and-Judy show. Then b) the slave girl fights back. And really fights back. Also, shes completely carnally into.
Pinning down a moment of exact decline has its limitations, but for me there was a definite all shift around 2005, towards the end of the sopranos era, and shortly after the advent of deadwood. And the show that crystallises the shift most readily. So what did Rome do that marked the decline? The most obvious thing was the introduction a phenomenon now so common its become a tired tv convention: the fight-fuck. Take this scene in Rome, where titus Pullo (which you might translate as Honourable Chicken) beats and fucks his slave. Now, you can justify this scene by saying that men in ancient Rome beat and fucked their slaves all the time. Im sure, afterward, those same bleeding slaves murmured to their masters, through the post-coital happy miasma, you can do whatever you like. This is just historical reportage, dammit!
Its become impossible not to ask: whats with all the sadistic machismo, hbo? Has Game of Thrones jumped the shark? Or has it jumped so high into its own frathouse flatulent ether that even that famous shark is lost from view, a sort of distant pin-glint in the water? The logical answer is of course,. The things that were always good about Game of Thrones are still good and in fact the show has recently upped its game in terms of tighter episode focus on compelling storylines. And certain central performances, like peter Dinklages, continue to deepen and delight. But what was rank in the show has only grown ranker. And you can only take in the whiff for so long before you start to wonder: is this an isolated problem with Game of Thrones, or does it signal something about hbos approach more generally? Article continues on next page, when it comes to sex, has hbo jumped the shark?
Game of, thrones, summary seasons 1
(Though honestly, looking back on it, deadwood was sometimes pushing.). The muses, somewhere up there, sipping their stiff drinks, shifting on their chaises longues, passing the remote, were pleased with. They were blessing the medium. And thats why, with Game of Thrones, there was a lot that your faithful audience was willing to overlook at the start. They took it on trust. The tittering frathouse atmosphere of so many bared boobies.
In a world of casual misogyny it seemed, initially, like a knowing nod. Even the most infamous case of sexposition the girl-on-girl sex scene in that constant brothel as Littlefinger narrates his history, pausing now and then to give the prostitutes instruction on what to do next, and how to do it could be explained in sympathetic terms. Littlefinger, and by extension Game of Thrones, was using the cliché of the girl-on-girl voyeuristic fantasy, bugbear of queer women everywhere, as an illustration of political manipulation. It was about connivance through performance, see? It was metaphor, not tits! But were in the fourth season now, and its getting tiring. . As this season has progressed, it has gotten darker and rapier, and theres no sign that the darkness and rapiness has any point other than as splaff-bait and as a sort of spurious edge-credential. .
Sure, there were plenty of boobs in The sopranos, genuine and otherwise. There was plenty of sexposition. You could rarely get through an episode without the rote titillations of Bada bing. But that seemed to be the point of the tits: they were meant to be rote, they were part of a wider exploration of a culture built around power and coercion, especially coercion through gender. The arses were a panorama.
Ditto The wire, a show that made a seurat of the join-the-dots police procedural. A show that could have gone crazy with the titties, but was sparing with the titties. The titties came out when there were ukrainians being trafficked for sex, or when a police informant (and bona fide Interesting Character) who happened to be a bar dancer, or when characters were in a brothel for a narratively compelling reason. In The wire, the characters had sex because grownups have sex. Occasional nakedness was a meaningful detail. A mixed bag, but all of them shows where explicitness and violence were for the most part approached in grownup ways, for grownup reasons.
Game of Thrones ' season 6 Episode 6: spoilers, summary, promo video and
There was so much to be proud. Its not the thing to say it now, but Sex and the city was a benchmark. It set so many new rules for television and changed the scene so completely that blood its hard to see now, looking back at it, what was so revolutionary. Before the last few seasons (and then the egregious movies) tipped it over into sentimentality, product placement, and the sexual status quo, sex and the city put a lot of good stuff in place for television in terms of whip-smart satire, comedy, cine-worthy production values. The tits had a purpose. And if Sex and the city was your mask of comedy, then The sopranos was your Mask of Tragedy. And boy, did you give it. Everything that tragedy was, everything that film and literature was, you showed us that tv could deliver too. Tony soprano: the flawed, neurotic, basic, brilliant, ruthless, sentimental bully-boy, the exemplar and antithesis of the American Dream.
Hes not on the drama side of things; he represents the perv side of the audience. And dnp this got me thinking about hbos role in all of this. A lot of the anger so far has understandably been directed at the shows writers and directors. And its true that theyre the ones on the ground, making the creative choices. But hbo influences these choices. Drastic departures from agreed-upon limits must be theirs to check, if they want. But not only does the ickiness of Game of Thrones only increase over time, but in the wake of the recent controversy about something as serious as rape, no less theyve come out with their explicit support. So why does this matter, hbo? . It matters, at least to me, because of what youve done for tv, how you helped messianically to transform the medium from Kraft cheese slices to roquefort.
email to The new York times, and defending the show, arguing the choices our creative teams make are based on the motivations and sensibilities. We fully support the vision and artistry of Dan and davids exceptional work and we feel this work speaks for itself. To which we might reply: yes, the work speaks for itself, but it also speaks for you, hbo. Youre a network, a conduit. You are what you choose to present. And this statement offers a blanket endorsement while also spectacularly passing the buck. Then theres this from neil Marshall, who directed the second season episode. Blackwater of Game of Thrones, and has described the surreal experience of being urged by an unnamed executive producer to add more full-frontal nude shots to scenes during filming.
Watch the scene for long enough and the cersei-jaime-corpse caper takes on the fond, sepia edges of an Edwardian picnic. Ah, for the rapes of yesteryear. If youre one of the large and increasingly vocal number of people who are disturbed by the treatment of sex and violence on Game of Thrones, then this scene probably provoked a familiar feeling of angry exhaustion. This reaction can be difficult to manage, because the sadness and weariness means you dont have much energy left for the anger. And especially as a person who doesnt generally have a problem with sex and violence you dont know where to direct the anger. Is it vegetarianism at george. Martin, the author of the novels on which the show is based? Or should it be at the shows co-creators, david Benioff and. Maybe the problem lies with the directors of offending episodes, such as Alex Graves, who gave us the jaime-cersei rape scene?
Game of Thrones season 7: a tl;dr season 6 recap ahead
Oh, game of Thrones. Could it be weve gone a few weeks without a rape? Or should I thesis say, rapes. How innocent it looks now, the controversial jaime-cersei scene, with its single demure assault of a grieving woman by her brother beside the poisoned corpse of their incestuously-begotten son. The next episode gifted us with a whole flotilla of angry cocks as in another departure from george. Martins source books the night Watch assaulted en masse the already serially abused daughter-wives of Craster. It made for grim viewing.